Lancashire urges that "vital" vaccine supply is not slowed because of rollout success

Lancashire County Council’s chief executive will write to the health secretary “seeking clarity” over whether vaccine supplies to the area have been reduced because of the rate at which it has been giving out the jabs.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

It was reported last month that the number of weekly doses being made available to the wider North West region would be cut by a third from this week – dropping from around 300,000 to 200,000.

The Health Service Journal said that the decision had been taken to allow other parts of the country that were not as far advanced in offering first doses to the top four priority groups a chance to “catch up”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Lancashire and South Cumbria have led the way within a North West region that has been one of the speediest when it comes to rolling out the vaccine.

Lancashire's first mass vaccination centre in Blackburn Cathedral (image: PA)Lancashire's first mass vaccination centre in Blackburn Cathedral (image: PA)
Lancashire's first mass vaccination centre in Blackburn Cathedral (image: PA)

However, the issue of supply appeared to become mired in confusion and politics in the wake of the report suggesting a diversion.

NHS England’s primary care director Nikki Kanani told the BBC that deliveries were being targeted “to make sure that they are going to areas where there are more people left to vaccinate in the priority cohorts”.

However, health secretary Matt Hancock said in the Commons last week that Lancashire would get its “fair share” in order to meet the mid-February target to give a first jab to the most vulnerable groups and dismissed “reports circulating on the internet” about the issue.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Lancashire County Council’s Labour opposition group leader Azhar Ali secured an emergency debate on the subject on Thursday, calling for a letter to be sent to the Prime Minister demanding that any diversion policy be reversed.

“I want everyone in the country to be vaccinated, but I don’t see why the success of the rollout in Lancashire means we should have to forego vaccinations. In parts of Lancashire, we have some of the worst health inequalities across the whole country.

“It’s our duty as elected members to ensure all people who need this vaccination get [it].

“If it is a supply problem then the government needs to address [it] – if there isn’t a supply problem, we need to stand up for people in Lancashire and make sure they get what they deserve,” County Cllr Ali said.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

He then accepted a “friendly amendment” from Conservative county councillor Charlie Edwards who instead requested that County Hall chief executive Angie Ridgwell contact Mr. Hancock to seek “clarity” over the situation - and acknowledged that it was “absolutely vital that the excellent progress made in the vaccination programme in Lancashire is allowed to continue unabated”.

Stating that he hoped the original motion was not a “a poor man’s attempt to have a bash at this government in its response to Covid in a [local] election year”, he added:

“Anybody watching this, doesn’t care what I or any other politician says.

“All you care about is if you have had, or are waiting to receive, your vaccine. You want the schools open and the country back on its feet.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“The light is at the end of the tunnel. Let’s tell our government we support a fair and strong vaccination programme,” County Cllr Edwards said.

Ms. Ridgwell had already issued a statement condemning any attempt to divert vaccines from the county when the reports suggesting such a move initially emerged.

Figures published on Thursday show that Lancashire and South Cumbria has given a first dose to 91 percent of its over-70s. That group, along with frontline NHS staff, the extremely clinically vulnerable and care home residents and staff make up the cohorts that the government intends to have offered an initial jab by Monday (15th February) - and it was announced on Friday that the target had been hit across England and Wales.

However, the emergency County Hall debate also heard from independent county councillor Paul Greenall who questioned whether the age-related risk posed by coronavirus should have been better reflected in the government’s action to combat it.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“It has been clear to me for some time that we have needed a mature, targeted response to Covid-19.

“Instead, I think our government have responded with inconsistency bordering on incompetence and sometimes enforcement bordering on authoritarianism – both of which have not only failed to stop the number of deaths from rising, but the collateral damage may not be known for years, “ County Cllr Greenall added.

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.